|
FINAL
EXAM STUDY GUIDE
History
270
Your
Final Exam is on Monday, May 20 (4-6 pm) and will consist of three parts:
Part
I - You
will be given 5 terms and will write on 3 (20 points each, 60 points total).
Part
II
- A short essay question (2-3 paragraphs) drawn from one or more of the terms
below (60 points).
Part
III - One long essay question chosen by the instructor
(130 points).
My
Ground Rules:
 | You
must bring a blue book.
|
 | No
one may leave the room when the test begins except to hand in a completed
exam (so go to the bathroom BEFORE the test).
|
 | Those
who arrive late will be allowed to take the test in the remaining time left provided
that no one has handed in an examine.
|
Essays
One of
the following questions will appear on your final exam.
Answer it in as much detail as you can.
Points will be awarded based on coherence, specificity, and the quality
of the argument made.
- Is
history a weapon? Some would
argue that its purpose should be to create higher self-esteem and
self-respect among disadvantaged ethnic/racial groups.
Others (such as Schlesinger) argue that this is the wrong approach to
history and is in fact a racist approach.
Assess this debate in detail and offer your own perspective as to
which side you fall on.
- Compare
and contrast the so-called "New" Immigration of the period
1890-1924 with the "New, New" immigration of the years since 1965,
taking a good look at both the origins and economic status of the immigrants
and the responses of the American societies that were receiving them. (Focus
particular attention in the post-1965 era on our discussions of L.A. and
Monterey Park.)
- Schlesinger
quotes sociologist Lawrence Fuchs as saying, "No nation in history had
proved as successful as the United States in managing ethnic diversity.
No nation before had ever made diversity itself a source of national
identity and unity." Considering
the political and social issues we have discussed in the context of
racial/ethnic relations in post-World War II America, do you agree or
disagree with Fuchs' assessment.
Terms
You
will write a detailed 1-2 paragraph essay for each of 3 terms in which you
address the following questions: who, what, where, when, and SIGNIFICANCE
(why it is important). Points will be awarded on the basis of coherence
and specificity.
| World
War II propaganda
|
Yellow
Peril |
anti-miscegenation
laws
|
| WWII
Home Front |
Marcus
Hansen |
Watts
Riots
|
| Manzanar
|
Third
Generation Theory |
Korean
Americans |
| acculturation
|
1.5
Generation |
Los
Angeles Riots
|
| The
New Ethnicity
|
Food
and National Identity |
Lau
v. Nichols
|
| American
Indian Movement
(AIM)
|
Jim
Crow |
ethnocentrism
|
| United
Fruit Workers
|
Black
Muslims
|
Cult of Ethnicity |
| 1965
Immigration Act
|
Letter
From a Birmingham Jail |
Ebonics
|
| Monterey
Park
|
Loving
vs. Virginia
|
consanguinity
principle
|
| Intra-Asian
Conflict
|
Interracial
couples
|
political
correctness |
| Model
Minority Thesis
|
Mixed
Race and the Census
|
persecution
complex
|
|